Which of these must the board avoid when presenting disciplinary action information publicly?

The board should avoid using jargon specific to the security industry when presenting disciplinary action information publicly because specialized language can create confusion for individuals who are not familiar with the industry. Clear communication is essential to ensure that the information is understandable to the general public and those affected by the disciplinary action. Using straightforward language helps convey the seriousness of the situation without alienating or confusing the audience.

Impartially presenting the information is necessary for maintaining credibility and trust, while ensuring transparency is designed to reassure stakeholders about the integrity of the disciplinary process. Disclosing the details of the complaint might be necessary but should be handled carefully to protect privacy and comply with legal standards. Therefore, avoiding jargon aligns with the goal of effective communication and fostering understanding.