Which of the following statements is true regarding the criminal history of an applicant?

The statement that the applicant can proceed unless stated otherwise within 48 hours is correct because this aligns with the procedural guidelines that govern the review of an applicant's criminal history in the context of hiring for positions regulated by the Texas DPS Private Security Bureau. It indicates that unless there is a reason to halt the process or if negative information arises from the background check within the specified time frame, the applicant is cleared to move forward in the hiring process. This procedure ensures efficiency while also allowing for the necessary evaluation of an applicant’s background without unnecessarily delaying the hiring process.

To provide context, the other statements focus on more restrictive or procedural aspects that may not accurately reflect the current practices. For instance, stating that the applicant must have no prior convictions may not take into account specific regulations or circumstances where past convictions might not preclude employment, depending on the nature of the offenses and the time elapsed. Additionally, the requirement for the employer to verify the applicant's history could be a part of due diligence, but it may not be an absolute requirement that stalls the application process. Similarly, while a background check is a key component, the manner in which it is requested and the applicant’s responsibilities can vary, making that statement less definitive than the correct choice.