Which of the following is a requirement for the board to revoke a license for a security officer?

The requirement for the board to revoke a license for a security officer based on abduction of a child or attempted abduction is a serious offense that directly affects public safety and the integrity of the security profession. The nature of this crime demonstrates a significant breach of trust and responsibility expected from someone in a security role. Such actions are not only illegal but also indicate a propensity for dangerous behavior that undermines the standards and ethics of the security industry.

This aggressive stance on offenses related to abduction is essential for maintaining the safety and security of the community, ensuring that individuals in security positions are trustworthy and capable of acting in the best interests of the public. When evaluating licensing decisions, the board must prioritize the protection of the public and the overall reputation of the security profession, making abduction-related offenses a clear justification for revocation.

In contrast, while other infractions such as failure to attend mandatory training or failure to report incidents are serious and can lead to disciplinary actions, they do not carry the same immediate implications for public safety as the act of abduction does. Receiving a citation from local law enforcement could indicate potential issues but does not automatically imply a significant threat or frame of character that justifies revocation on the same level as an offense like attempted