Which of the following does the Texas Private Security Act not apply to as per Chapter 1702.325?

The Texas Private Security Act, specifically Chapter 1702.325, outlines the various exemptions to the regulations that govern private security services and practitioners within the state. Among the listed choices, common carriers maintaining public safety is the correct answer because they are typically regulated under different statutes than those that govern private security. The intent of the law is to ensure that specific roles that already operate under different regulatory frameworks are not double-regulated or unnecessarily restricted by the provisions of the Private Security Act.

Common carriers, such as airlines or shipping companies, are primarily focused on the transportation of goods or people and are generally governed by transportation laws rather than the securities regulations applicable to private security firms. This distinction allows them to perform their functions without needing to comply with private security regulations, as their primary focus is on their regulated functions related to transportation and public safety.

In contrast, employees of common carriers, private investigators, and individuals providing security services are all considered under the purview of the Texas Private Security Act because they engage in activities that are directly related to providing security or investigative services, which necessitates compliance with the licensing and operational standards set forth in this act. Thus, recognizing the specific context of common carriers highlights why they are exempt from the stipulations of the Texas Private