When reviewing a proposed rule, which of the following is required from the Public Safety Commission?

The requirement for the Public Safety Commission to return the proposed rule for any identified issues that must be resolved is grounded in the regulatory process designed to ensure that all aspects of a rule are thoroughly vetted before implementation. This step is crucial for maintaining the quality, effectiveness, and legality of the rules that govern private security operations in Texas.

When the Commission identifies issues within a proposed rule, it is their responsibility to ensure those concerns are addressed. This helps avoid potential legal challenges and ensures that the rules serve their intended purpose without unintended consequences. By returning the rule for resolution of these issues, the Commission fulfills its role in promoting accountability and thoroughness in the regulatory process. This contributes to the overall integrity and efficacy of the regulations impacting the private security industry.

In contrast, options like immediate approval without changes or requiring a consensus from local security agencies do not reflect the necessary scrutiny that rules must undergo. Similarly, while a financial impact analysis is important in many contexts, it is not a standalone requirement for all proposed rules under the oversight of the Public Safety Commission. These aspects highlight the importance of careful review and due diligence in regulatory processes, underscoring why returning a proposed rule for issue resolution is a critical step.