What type of review is guaranteed to a person concerning the board's order?

Judicial review is the correct answer because it ensures that individuals have the right to challenge a board's order in a court of law. This type of review evaluates the legality of actions taken by governmental agencies, including boards, ensuring that their decisions adhere to established laws and regulations.

Judicial review is fundamental in upholding the rule of law, allowing individuals to seek remedies if they believe their rights have been violated by administrative actions. This process involves a higher court examining the case to determine if proper procedures were followed and if the decision made by the board was lawful and just within the parameters of the statute governing its authority.

In contrast, administrative review typically refers to internal reviews conducted within an agency or department, which may not provide the same level of formality or legal scrutiny. Peer review often pertains to evaluations conducted by colleagues in a profession, focusing on standards or practices rather than legal reconsideration of an administrative order. Public review may involve community input or feedback but does not guarantee a legal challenge or oversight, making it inadequate for ensuring individual rights in the context of board orders.