What must a person do at the preliminary hearing regarding their application or license?

At a preliminary hearing regarding an application or license, the individual must show cause why the application should not have been denied or the license suspended. This is a critical aspect of the appeals process, where the responsibility lies with the applicant to articulate and demonstrate the reasons their application should be approved despite the initial decision to deny it or suspend the license.

This requirement essentially shifts the burden of proof onto the applicant. They must present compelling arguments or evidence to counter the basis for the denial or suspension, highlighting any errors in judgment or misunderstandings that may have occurred during the review process. This mechanism helps ensure that decisions made by the licensing authority can be contested and reviewed fairly.

In contrast, other options may not align with the specific legal procedures involved in a preliminary hearing. For instance, proving innocence of any charges is not typically a direct requirement at this stage; instead, addressing the rationale behind the decision is key. Providing additional documentation, while possibly useful, is generally not the primary focus during the preliminary hearing itself. Similarly, requesting a delay could be an option, but it does not fulfill the requirement to present a case for why the application or license should be upheld.