What is the consequence of multiple requests for continuance based on presumed lack of good cause?

When multiple requests for continuance are made based on a presumed lack of good cause, these requests are generally viewed with skepticism. The presumption is that the requests may not be justified if there is a pattern of submitting them without sufficient rationale. Consequently, the proper response in such situations is to deny these requests, asserting that a track record of similar requests lacks the necessary foundation to be granted another continuance. This policy is in place to prevent abuse of the process and ensure that proceedings are not unnecessarily delayed. It emphasizes the importance of presenting a compelling reason each time a request for continuance is submitted.