What happens if an offense is not explicitly listed but is similar in elements to a listed offense?

When an offense is not explicitly listed but shares similar elements with a listed offense, it is treated as disqualifying. This is based on the principle that certain offenses, even if not specifically mentioned, reflect similar moral turpitude or criminal behavior that warrants concern regarding an individual's fitness for licensing or employment in security-related roles.

The idea is to maintain high standards of integrity and trustworthiness in the private security industry. By adopting a broad approach to disqualification, the regulatory framework aims to ensure that individuals with questionable conduct, even if their offenses do not match the exact language of the law, are still subject to scrutiny. This protects the public and the industry from potential risks associated with hiring individuals who may not uphold the necessary ethical standards.

The other options do not align with this principle of maintaining security standards. Disregarding an offense entirely would undermine regulatory authority, while classifying it merely as a misdemeanor or requiring special review does not adequately address the potential risk associated with similar offenses. This comprehensive approach ensures consistency and thoroughness in the evaluation of applicants for security positions.