What does the board not have the authority to adopt regarding experience or education requirements?

The board is not authorized to adopt experience or education requirements that are overly restrictive and narrow access to licensing. This principle ensures that the licensing process remains accessible to a broad range of applicants, promoting inclusivity and allowing individuals from various backgrounds to enter the private security profession. Excessively stringent rules could hinder qualified individuals from obtaining licenses just because they do not fit into a narrow set of criteria.

This focus on maintaining a balanced approach towards requirements aligns with the goals of regulatory bodies, which often seek to protect the public interest while encouraging a diverse and capable workforce in fields such as private security. The goal is to uphold standards that ensure quality and safety, but not at the cost of excluding qualified candidates unnecessarily.

In contrast, competitive or flexible requirements may still provide a pathway for individuals seeking to enter the profession without being unreasonably restrictive. Voluntary requirements could also allow individuals to gain additional qualifications without being necessary for licensure, thereby not limiting access to licensing in a significant way.