What action may a subpoena under the Texas Private Security Act impose if it relates to an ongoing criminal investigation?

When discussing the implications of a subpoena under the Texas Private Security Act in the context of an ongoing criminal investigation, the correct action involves prohibiting the disclosure of whether records have been furnished. This is essential to ensure that the integrity of the ongoing investigation is maintained. If individuals or organizations were allowed to disclose that they received a subpoena or that records had been provided, it could potentially compromise the investigation by alerting suspects or enabling them to alter their behavior in ways that hinder law enforcement's efforts.

A subpoena, particularly in sensitive and high-stakes situations like criminal investigations, aims to gather information discreetly. Maintaining confidentiality assists in upholding the investigative process and protecting the interests of law enforcement. This measure is designed to avoid any interference, allowing investigators to proceed without external distractions or influences that might arise from premature disclosures.

While identifying the records requested may be an element of a subpoena, the key focus here is on confidentiality regarding whether those records were actually delivered. Similarly, disclosure about the issuance of the subpoena or confirmation of its receipt may not necessarily align with the overarching goal of protecting the ongoing investigation, reinforcing why the first and fourth choices do not capture the correct principle in this context.