If a board member is absent from more than half of the meetings, what must happen for them not to be removed?

The requirement for a board member who is absent from more than half of the meetings to avoid removal hinges on receiving approval by a majority vote of the board. This stipulation is designed to ensure that the board can maintain a level of accountability and participation among its members. It recognizes that absence can impact the decision-making and overall function of the board, so having the majority endorse retention helps affirm that the member still has the confidence of their peers despite their attendance record.

In this context, the need for a majority vote reflects the principles of democratic governance within the board, allowing members to collectively decide on the status of an absent colleague rather than leaving such decisions solely to external authorities or public opinion. This process promotes fairness, as it gives the member the opportunity to explain their absences and seek support from their fellow board members.